Loading repository dataβ¦
Loading repository dataβ¦
HBarefoot / repository
π§ Persistent memory for AI agents. SQLite for agent state. Zero cloud dependencies. Local embeddings. MCP-native integration with Claude Desktop/Code, Cursor, Windsurf & more.
A transparent discovery signal based on current public GitHub metadata.
This score does not audit code, security, maintainers, documentation quality, or suitability. Verify the repository and its current documentation before adoption.
EngramPersistent memory for AI agents. In-process. No infra.
Give your AI agent the memory of a colleague who's worked with you for years β without cloud, API keys, or Docker.
β Useful to you? Star it on GitHub β it's the simplest way to help others find Engram.
npm install -g @hbarefoot/engram
engram start
Your AI agent now has long-term memory. Two minutes, no setup, no cloud.
Engram runs inside your agent's process β no service to deploy, no account, nothing leaving your machine. That design choice is measurable:
| Metric | Engram | |
|---|---|---|
| Cold start β first recall | under 200 ms | import β first answer, model load included (M-series; hardware-dependent) |
| Warm recall (p50, 1k memories) | ~4 ms | median query latency once the model is in memory |
| Package download | ~571 KB | the npm package (1.3 MB unpacked) |
| Embedding model | ~23 MB | all-MiniLM-L6-v2, fetched once, cached at ~/.engram/models |
| External services | 0 | no database, broker, or cloud account |
| Works offline | β | zero network calls on the default path |
Measured on an Apple M4 Pro over 1,000 seeded memories β reproduce with npm run bench. These are footprint and latency numbers, not an accuracy claim: Engram doesn't try to out-rank Mem0 or Zep on memory benchmarks. The point is solid recall with none of the operational surface.
Optional accuracy lift β still 100% local. If you already run a local model, the opt-in LLM layer sharpens fact extraction: entity-extraction accuracy climbs from 45.8% (rule-based) to 95.8% with the recommended henrybarefoot1987/engram-extract model (qwen3:1.7b) β +50 pts β without a single byte leaving your device.
Engram is free and MIT-licensed β and always will be. No paywalls, no tier-locked features, no telemetry. Every feature ships in the open-source package. Sponsorship is purely a way to fund continued development, not to unlock anything.
If Engram saves you time, you can sponsor it via Polar:
| Tier | Price / month | For |
|---|---|---|
| π± Supporter | $5 | Individuals who want the project to keep shipping. |
| β‘ Power User | $25 | Heavy users who rely on Engram day to day. |
| π₯ Team | $100 | Teams standardizing on Engram across projects. |
| π’ Enterprise | $499 | Priority response on issues + dedicated integration help. |
About Enterprise. Engram is MIT-licensed, so commercial use is already granted β you don't need to buy a license to use it at work. The Enterprise tier buys priority response on issues and dedicated help wiring Engram into your stack. For organizations whose policy precludes depending on MIT-licensed software, an optional commercial-license override is available on request. (Engram is maintained by a solo developer, so this is best-effort priority response, not a contractual SLA.)
Most agent-memory products are services you run alongside your agent β Postgres, Docker, cloud accounts, API keys. Engram embeds inside your agent's process: a focused, stable npm package with practical guardrails.
| Engram | Lodis | Mem0 / OpenMemory | Zep | Letta | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maturity | v1.9.x, stable | v0.5.x, early | mature / SaaS | v0.x | v0.x |
| Infra to operate | None (npm package) | None (npx package) | Cloud account or multi-container Docker | Docker + Postgres + Graphiti | Docker + Postgres |
| Install footprint | ~23 MB | ~22 MB | Hundreds of MB containers (self-hosted) | Hundreds of MB | Hundreds of MB |
| Works offline | β | β | β Cloud / β if self-hosted | β External embed provider | β External LLM provider |
| MCP-native | β Primary | β Primary | π‘ OpenMemory ships an MCP server | β REST/SDK | β REST/SDK |
| REST API alongside MCP | β | β MCP-only | β Cloud | β | β |
| Surface area | 6 tools, 5 categories | 40 tools, 14 entity types + 4 permanence tiers + temporal supersession | varies | varies | varies |
| Automatic secret detection | β Blocks on every write | π‘ memory_scrub opt-in tool | π‘ Not first-class | π‘ Not first-class | π‘ Not first-class |
| Agent auto-discovery | β Dashboard Integration Wizard | β Manual config | β | β | β |
| Desktop app | β macOS Tauri menu bar | β | β | β | β |
| LLM-powered extraction | β Optional, on-device (Ollama; rule-based default) | β LLM-free read/write | β Built-in | β Built-in | β Built-in |
| Feedback / contradiction workflow |
Sources: @sunriselabs/lodis, Sunrise-Labs-Dot-AI/engrams, mem0.ai, github.com/getzep/zep, github.com/letta-ai/letta. See docs/competitive-intel.md for the full breakdown. Engram ships optional, on-device LLM extraction (v1.9+): point llm.* at a local model β the recommended henrybarefoot1987/engram-extract (Qwen3-1.7B, Apache-2.0) or any Ollama / OpenAI-compatible endpoint β to sharpen category/entity extraction (entity recognition +50 pts vs rules β 45.8% β 95.8% β with engram-extract (qwen3:1.7b) in our benchmark), still 100% local and off by default (the zero-config path stays rule-based, offline, and infra-free). Mem0/Zep/Letta build LLM extraction in via a cloud model; Lodis is LLM-free read/write with a broader feature surface β we list it honestly.
TL;DR β when each one fits. Pick Engram if you want a focused, stable, local-first memory layer with practical guardrails (secret detection, agent auto-discovery, desktop app), a simple 5-category mental model, and optional on-device LLM extraction when you want it. Pick Lodis if you want a knowledge-graph-style memory with 14 entity types and temporal supersession. Pick Mem0/Zep/Letta if you want cloud-LLM extraction built in and don't mind operating infrastructure for it.
npm install -g @hbarefoot/engram
engram start # MCP + REST + Dashboard on localhost:3838
engram start --mcp-only # MCP server only, stdio mode (for agent integration)
Claude Code:
claude mcp add engram -- engram start --mcp-only
Claude Desktop β add to ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"engram": {
"command": "engram",
"args": ["start", "--mcp-only"]
}
}
}
Cline / Cursor / Windsurf β add the same mcpServers block to your editor's MCP config. The built-in dashboard at http://localhost:3838 has an Integration Wizard that auto-detects your installed agents and generates the config for you.
You: "Remember that our API uses JWT tokens with 24-hour expiry."
Claude: (stores via engram_remember)
You: (next day) "What authentication approach are we using?"
Claude: (recalls via engram_recall) β "JWT tokens, 24-hour expiry."
Memories persist across sessions, machine restarts, and even between different AI clients sharing the same Engram instance.
Most memory systems are append-only stores: write once, retrieve forever, hope for the best. Engram learns.
engram_feedback) β when an agent recalls a memory, you or the agent can vote it helpful or unhelpful. Memories accumulate a score in [-1, 1]; consistently-unhelpful memories see their confidence decay automatically.The longer you use Engram, the sharper its recall gets.
Engram exposes 6 tools to AI agents over stdio:
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
engram_remember | Store a memory with category, entity, confidence, namespace, tags. Auto-runs secret detection. |
engram_recall | Hybrid semantic + FTS5 search. Supports category, namespace, threshold, and time_filter. |
engram_forget | Delete a specific memory by ID. |
engram_feedback | Vote a memory helpful/unhelpful. Drives the feedback loop above. |
engram_context | Pre-formatted context block (markdown / xml / json / plain) with a token budget for system-prompt injection. |
engram_status | Health check: memory count, model status, configuration. |
Connecting the MCP server gives your agent the memory tools β but not the judgment to use them well. The bundled *
| β Side-by-side conflict-resolution UI + feedback loop |
| π‘ Programmatic correct/confirm/supersede tools |
| π‘ No first-class feedback |
| π‘ |
| π‘ |